Swanson JMJ, Wagoner JA, Baker NA, McCammon JA. Optimizing the Poisson dielectric boundary with explicit solvent forces and energies: lessons learned with atom-centered dielectric functions. J Chem Theory Comput, 3, 170-83, 2007.
Accurate implicit solvent models require parameters that have been optimized in a system- and/or atom-specific manner based on experimental data or more rigorous explicit solvent simulations. Models based on the Poisson or Poisson-Boltzmann equation are particularly sensitive to the nature and location of the boundary which separates the low dielectric solute from the high dielectric solvent. Here we present a novel method for optimizing the solute radii, which define the dielectric boundary, based on forces and energies from explicit solvent simulations. We use this method to optimize radii for protein systems defined by AMBER ff99 partial charges and a spline-smoothed solute surface. The spline-smoothed surface is an atom-centered dielectric function that enables stable and efficient force calculations. We explore the relative performance of radii optimized with forces alone and those optimized with forces and energies. We show that our radii reproduce the explicit solvent forces and energies more accurately than four other parameter sets commonly used in conjunction with the AMBER force field, each of which has been appropriately scaled for spline-smoothed surfaces. Finally, we demonstrate that spline-smoothed surfaces show surprising accuracy for small, compact systems, but may have limitations for highly-solvated protein systems. The optimization method presented here is efficient and applicable to any system with explicit solvent parameters. It can be used to determine the optimal continuum parameters when experimental solvation energies are unavailable and the computational costs of explicit solvent charging free energies are prohibitive.
Wagoner JA, Baker NA. Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 8331-6, 2006.
Continuum solvation models provide appealing alternatives to explicit solvent methods due to their ability to reproduce solvation effects while alleviating the need for expensive sampling. Our previous work has demonstrated that Poisson-Boltzmann methods are capable of faithfully reproducing polar explicit solvent forces for dilute protein systems; however, the popular solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) model was shown to be incapable of accurately describing nonpolar solvation forces at atomic length scales. Therefore, alternate continuum methods are needed to reproduce nonpolar interactions at the atomic scale. In the present work, we address this issue by supplementing the SASA model with additional volume and dispersion integral terms suggested by scaled particle models and Weeks-Chandler-Andersen theory, respectively. This more complete nonpolar implicit solvent model shows very good agreement with explicit solvent results and suggests that, although often overlooked, the inclusion of appropriate dispersion and volume terms are essential for an accurate implicit solvent description of atomic-scale nonpolar forces.
Wagoner JA, Baker NA. Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 8331-8336, 2006.
Continuum solvation models provide appealing alternatives to explicit solvent methods because of their ability to reproduce solvation effects while alleviating the need for expensive sampling. Our previous work has demonstrated that Poisson-Boltzmann methods are capable of faithfully reproducing polar explicit solvent forces for dilute protein systems; however, the popular solvent-accessible surface area model was shown to be incapable of accurately describing nonpolar solvation forces at atomic-length scales. Therefore, alternate continuum methods are needed to reproduce nonpolar interactions at the atomic scale. In the present work, we address this issue by supplementing the solvent-accessible surface area model with additional volume and dispersion integral terms suggested by scaled particle models and Weeks–Chandler–Andersen theory, respectively. This more complete nonpolar implicit solvent model shows very good agreement with explicit solvent results and suggests that, although often overlooked, the inclusion of appropriate dispersion and volume terms are essential for an accurate implicit solvent description of atomic-scale nonpolar forces.
Accurate implicit solvent models require parameters that have been optimized in a system- and/or atom-specific manner based on experimental data or more rigorous explicit solvent simulations. Models based on the Poisson or Poisson-Boltzmann equation are particularly sensitive to the nature and location of the boundary which separates the low dielectric solute from the high dielectric solvent. Here we present a novel method for optimizing the solute radii, which define the dielectric boundary, based on forces and energies from explicit solvent simulations. We use this method to optimize radii for protein systems defined by AMBER ff99 partial charges and a spline-smoothed solute surface. The spline-smoothed surface is an atom-centered dielectric function that enables stable and efficient force calculations. We explore the relative performance of radii optimized with forces alone and those optimized with forces and energies. We show that our radii reproduce the explicit solvent forces and energies more accurately than four other parameter sets commonly used in conjunction with the AMBER force field, each of which has been appropriately scaled for spline-smoothed surfaces. Finally, we demonstrate that spline-smoothed surfaces show surprising accuracy for small, compact systems, but may have limitations for highly-solvated protein systems. The optimization method presented here is efficient and applicable to any system with explicit solvent parameters. It can be used to determine the optimal continuum parameters when experimental solvation energies are unavailable and the computational costs of explicit solvent charging free energies are prohibitive.
